1. Cats have retractable claws, which means they don't need them to walk, jump or do anything else.....unless they happen to be scratching something with them. (Outdoor cats use them to catch prey, but they don't need to do that.) It is NOT harmful to a domestic housecat, nor is it animal abuse, to remove the front claws. It does not change their posture---they still stand, walk, and jump the exact same way as cats who have their claws. (Do not remove the rear ones, as they need those to scratch themselves when they itch....and they are also what the cat uses if it accidentally gets outside. Ever watch a cat fight or climb? Those rear claws are crucial.)
2. If you decide to have it done, your cat will be under general anesthesia for the surgery (meaning it will NOT feel it being done), and will most likely receive pain medication afterward, if it is needed. They'll talk to you about preanesthetic bloodwork to help decrease anesthetic risk. I highly recommend it---and in many cases, I require it.
3. Find a DVM experienced with using a surgical laser for that procedure. It seals the nerve endings....so there is virtually no pain afterward (pain meds are not "needed" when it's done with a laser. I KNOW THIS for a fact, because I have zapped myself with the exact same laser at a power much higher than what is used for declaw surgery. Less than 5 seconds afterward, there is NO PAIN AT THE CUT SITE WHATSOEVER.) Less than an hour afterward, cats that have been laser-declawed are up walking around normally, grooming themselves, etc. (You still need to restrict the walking and jumping for a week or two, in order to allow tissues to heal properly.) The laser also cauterizes (seals) the tiny blood vessels, so bandages are not even needed anymore. There is very rarely even one drop of blood---and that is without any tourniquets, which means there is zero risk of accidental nerve damage (radial nerve paralysis) from the tourniquets, like there USED TO BE. It was rare, but it still happened from time to time. Not anymore. No possibility at all...none...zippo. The laser also destroys any bacteria at the surgical site, making infections rare. Postop complications in general from laser declaws done by experienced surgeons are exceedingly rare. And since the entire ungual process is removed, there is zero chance of regrowth of a deformed claw----it cannot grow back in any way, shape, form, or fashion when the ungual process is completely removed.
Talk to your DVM about it----please don't listen to the "yahoos" on here who give answers based on erroneous emotions and things they've "heard." Just make sure all of your questions are answered to your satisfaction in advance, by the surgeon who will actually be perfoming the procedure.
It's still not my *favorite* surgery, but it no longer bothers me to do it. Cats do great with it. And if your cat is scratching you or your guests up, there are diseases that can be transmitted that way---Bartonella, for example. You also have to worry about legal liability when your cat "attacks" visitors....because you ARE legally liable for their injuries.
If you are not sure, try Soft-Paws first. But most of my clients come back a few months later saying they find that that's more trouble than it's worth. It will buy you some "deciding time," however.
Don't let anyone make you feel guilty if you decide to declaw. Those who do refuse to acknowledge the millions of cats who have been declawed that have no problems with it whatsoever----ones we see for the rest of their lives, so we know.
Many laws are passed based upon nothing but emotion and pressure from special interest groups that scream "abuse" to get attention. Just because a law is passed doesn't mean it's justified.
Edit on 3/4/08: Hmmmm.....if I were "only recommending it for the money" I wouldn't have any declawed cats of my own, now would I? (Not all of them are, only a couple who met my criteria.) I sure don't make any money when I do that---it's not like I can charge myself for it. It costs me money to do it, too...even for my own cats. The drugs, supplies, and equipment don't just show up on my doorstep for free. And I sure wouldn't choose 'that' surgery to promote for making money.....because all things considered, we barely make any money on it as it is. (It ought to be a $2000-$5000 surgery, but I bet no one here has paid anywhere close to that.) And I find it ironic that the woman who compares me to a drug dealer also suggests using DRUGS (which have side effects and must be closely monitored with periodic evaluations and bloodwork---something I'm thinking this cat won't approve without an "argument") to control this cat. The truth is, this is just this cat's personality. Some cats are this way and can't be changed at this age. (Like some people can have deeply ingrained personality traits, so can animals.) They're gonna do what they're gonna do, claws or not. Declawing this particular cat is NOT likely to make it worse (unless all 4 feet are done, which I don't recommend), but declawing it can prevent serious human injury/infections, etc. from developing. If this owner doesn't declaw, it sounds like it's only a matter of time before that happens, leading to either the euthanasia of the cat or turning it over to the animal shelter, who will likely also euthanize it for the behavioral issues. Contrary to what has been posted here, THAT is the main reason people turn cats in----for behavioral issues----not anything related to declawing. Declawed cats have no higher predisposition to urination outside of the box issues than the general cat population. If a declawed cat does that, it was already going to start doing that at a certain age anyway---due to an unrelated medical cause that some owners find to be too much trouble to treat medically---in other words, it was going to become a problem anyway, irrespective of the cat's clawed/declawed status. *Sigh* But no, I haven't seen this issue arise literally hundreds upon hundreds of times. Guess I should go burn my diploma now. *sigh*
Oh, and as much as people would like to convince others, removing a cat's claws is NOT the same thing as amputating the ends of the fingers or toes of humans, who use those parts for other things. The claws of a cat have one function and one function only----to scratch. (Unless they live outdoors and catch prey.) At all other times, they are retracted and not being used. The exception to that is the big cats like lions, tigers, etc. Their digital anatomy is different, and that phalanx stays extended all the time (like it does in dogs), which is exactly why *those* species CANNOT be declawed without creating ambulation problems. Domestic cats walk on their digital pads and P2, whether they have claws or not. P3 (the part removed in declaw surgery) is not at all involved in walking, etc.....EXCEPT in the large species of felids.
Add'l edit, to the asker: What color is your cat? Is it by any chance a torti or calico?
Final edit, for the asker....and for anyone else who wants to educate themselves as to the truth rather than a bunch of alarmist propaganda....here are some post op pics of some so-called "mutilated" feet that I pulled from my private surgery files that I keep to show to colleagues interested in learning new procedures:
1. Tigger's paw, immediately post op. He had just been taken off of the isoflurane gas and oxygen anesthesia. He was 10.6# and just over 2 yrs old at the time of this surgery. He was up walking around perfectly normally less than 2 hrs later. His owner, who had had many cats declawed "the old way" was thrilled. Said she never saw any evidence he'd even had the surgery.
http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj175/GroupTwoPics/386.jpg
Closeup: http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj175/GroupTwoPics/385.jpg
Oh, I should note: Later that afternoon, I happened to walk by and noticed him batting around a ball in his cage and took it away. When I asked around to find out which staff member I needed to scold, it turns out that one of the animal care attendants had given it to him because she said he acted like he wanted to play, sticking his paws out through the cage door to (playfully) "bat" at her hair as she was cleaning the cage underneath him. She'd come in after lunch and thought he hadn't had his surgery yet....she saw "declaw" on his cage card and thought is was scheduled for the NEXT day. She was used to them laying around and being lethargic after declawing at the previous clinic where she'd worked, so she just assumed he was preop.
2. Mushroom, an 8.7# Siamese mix. He was about a year and a half when this surgery was done. This is immed. postop, still intubated and on plain oxygen (off gas) at this point, and hooked up to IV fluids, with pulse oximetry clip still on his tongue. You can't see them in this photo, but his ECG leads were still on.
In other words, I had JUST FINISHED the surgery on the foot in the foreground...literally less than a minute before taking the photo. The foot with the IV had already been done by another surgeon (we usually put the IV in the rear leg for this surgery, but this one had it in the front instead.) See the teensy tiny speck of blood right next to it? It was her very first one, and I was teaching her how to use the laser. Pretty danged good to only have one tiny speck of blood in only one out of 5 toes, for a first time.
http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj175/GroupTwoPics/012.jpg
I have well over a hundred pics like this. (Quit taking them after while